A video that is rumored to depict RuPaul’s Drag Race contestant Rock M Sakura completely naked (except for shoes, satchel, glasses and of course cellphone) and receiving oral sex, in public and in broad daylight, is being passed around on social media like coronavirus at church.
The 13-second video was supposedly recorded in San Francisco at the Folsom Street Fair, a notoriously raunchy gay pride event that even makes StickyDrama blush. Apparently, no RPDR fan website has posted the video or even reported it yet, although they all must be aware of its existence by now and probably possess it too.
StickyDrama is not posting the video, but we did watch it and can report that a man who looks exactly like Sakura stands somewhere outside and in daylight surrounded by people. A second man approaches Sakura, grabs Sakura’s rice noodle, gives it a few sucks and then walks away. Sakura cooperates and even smiles at the camera during the entire clip. The shoe of the man slurping down the pho can be seen in the lower right of our censored screencap, and he’s wearing a backpack that appears in the upper-middle right just above our logo.
StickyDrama tweeted to @RockMSakura requesting comment 3 hours prior to publishing this post, but received no response.
@RockMSakura The video of you getting your dick sucked in public, any comment? I followed you in case you want to DM. Posting soon so please reply immediately if you have anything to say.
— StickyDrama (@stickydrama) April 8, 2020
On that point, what StickyDrama can only describe as a conspiracy of silence is even more shocking than the video itself. Plenty of other bloggers and vloggers–particularly Jakeyonce, described by some as the “StickyDrama” of RuPaul’s Drag Race–cover RPDR queens religiously and must be aware of this video. Yet not only have they not posted it, they even refuse to discuss or acknowledge it. Maybe if we had smothered our tweet in bacon grease, Jakeyonce would have noticed it.
Speculation among RPDR fandom is that commentators and the queens themselves prefer to focus only on television-friendly petty drama, and avoid anything that would land on the front page of StickyDrama in order to avoid the loss of sponsorship and advertising dollars. Meanwhile, StickyDrama has a real job and can say whatever the fuck we want.
@jakeyoncetv Surely you’re aware of the video of @RockMSakura getting a BJ on a public street in broad daylight. I don’t regularly follow you but am told you haven’t posted or even mentioned it. Is that true? If so, why?
— StickyDrama (@stickydrama) April 8, 2020
No response to that either, 2 hours prior to publishing this post. Don’t worry, dear readers, StickyDrama has long been used to rejection. But Jakeyonce is definitely active on Twitter as we type, tweeting about nothing nearly as juicy as this story:
Thinking about fucking around and blocking all of the shitty gay magazines????
— jakeyoncetv (@jakeyoncetv) April 8, 2020
StickyDrama is well aware that people tend to get their feathers ruffled about posting n00dz nowadays. First of all, we did not post the video. Also, Sakura was standing totally naked on a public street where multiple observers are in the video’s background; therefore, the video was never private. Sakura is also clearly aware of the recording, looking and smiling right into the cameraphone at times, so the whole nonconsensual argument doesn’t apply here either. And he’s a public figure, thanks to his time on Drag Race. Even in states with laws against so-called “revenge porn,” the video is newsworthy for the shocking act as well as the individual involved.
The moral of today’s story, dear readers? Gosh, that’s a toughie. StickyDrama is going to go out on a limb and advise that if you don’t want people to talk about your walking around naked and getting your dick sucked in public, don’t walk around naked and get your dick sucked in public.
Even the Canadians agree: Ain’t nobody crazier than trannies. And Jessica Yaniv is a tranny to the core.
Yaniv made international headlines when he tried to force a female aesthetician to wax his balls. The situation was truly an Oppression Olympics, because Yaniv was crying sex discrimination whereas the aesthetician was an immigrant with little financial resources and poor English skills. StickyDrama has to give credit were it’s due, Yaniv clearly knew how to game the system by playing the victim card, with 16 human rights complaints filed with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal alleging that the the aestheticians’ refusal to wax a tranny’s balls constituted discrimination.
At first, the Tribunal treated Yaniv’s complaint seriously, with one member writing: “Waxing can be critical gender-affirming care for transgender women[.]” They are Canadian, after all. But it didn’t take long before they found Yaniv’s conduct troubling. Canada’s National Post reported:
The tribunal member hearing the cases has scolded Yaniv, saying her behaviour in pursuing case after case, even after the Tribunal cautioned against wasteful “unnecessary duplication,” has not been “conducive to having the issue resolved on its merits,” and “opens a valid question about her motives in filing so many complaints.”
The Tribunal member also called “improper” Yaniv’s tactic of withdrawing complaints against some of her targets who obtained free legal representation and made clear they intended to defend themselves at a hearing, rather than go through the tribunal’s settlement process…
She also has such a focus on the Asian background of the salon workers in question that the tribunal has cautioned her for fixating on racial stereotypes about South Asian Canadians and making “derogatory assumptions” about the “culture” of Honveer Randhawa, legal counsel to one of the salons.
Meanwhile, back to the present: Multiple sources are reporting that Yaniv was suspended for the ostensibly harmless act of tweeting a photograph of a check. But in light of her litigious past, Yaniv’s suspension could be viewed as punishment for a violation of Twitter’s terms of service, specifically its rule against harassment. The check, you see, is apparently the fine that the Tribunal ultimately awarded to the immigrant defendant in the complaint Yaniv had lodged in 2018. Yaniv’s Twitter itself indicates that it has only been suspended, not fully banned from the platform. Really, no biggie. Frankly, payment to a public entity should be a public record that should not be wrong to publicly share, regardless of however it impacts people’s feelings.
In point of fact, StickyDrama’s Twitter has also been suspended for about a week or so, punishment for the TOS “violation” of tweeting a police report obtained pursuant to a public record request. That’s right, the police provided one of their own reports to StickyDrama in exchange for a small fee that we paid in compliance with state law, and they even redacted information that was required to be hidden in their judgment, and still Twitter suspended us for tweeting it. No, it wasn’t that bitch Carole fucking Baskin who reported us; it was that bitch Kiki fucking Kannibal.
So there’s that, just so nobody could accuse StickyDrama of throwing stones from our glass house. Aside from the whole “wax my balls or I’ll sue” meme that flooded our Facebook feeds a few months ago, Yaniv is mostly a Canadian curiosity who rarely makes U.S. headlines. If the reader is so inclined, a simple Google search of Jessica Yaniv and Jonathan Yaniv (they yield different results) will reveal all sorts of sordid stories; unfortunately, some of the juiciest allegations come from questionable sources. We won’t mention them all, even though pretty much all the motherfuckers have a shitload more traffic than we do.
But of all the sources, only the National Post strikes StickyDrama as remotely credible and worth the read for exploring the “new legal perils and moral quandaries” of the situation. Their writer also deserves a Pulitzer for this poetic description of the most circulated photograph of Yaniv:
“Here was a caricatured image of an apparent trans bogeyman, in a dress reminiscent of the one worn by Ursula the Sea Witch, allegedly talking about pestering little girls in bathrooms for pleasure.”
Interesting to note that the very least credible of them all, Life Site News, reported that “Langley RCMP [Royal Canadian Mounted Police] charged Yaniv in December with two counts of possessing an illegal weapon in connection with an August 5 incident in which Yaniv was seen brandishing and appeared to fire off a Taser during a heated livestreamed debate with American conservative transgender “woman” and activist Blair White.” This tidbit might explain the alt-right darling’s jubilation yesterday over Yaniv’s supsension:
And about that “pedophile” remark, quite a few sources, including the National Post, allege that Yaniv has an unwholesome fascination with young girls, which, if true, would make Yaniv not unlike 90% of all heterosexual men. However, it’s worth noting that the National Post cautiously characterizes the claims and allegations concerning young girls as just that, “claims” and “allegations.” Other sources post lurid screenshots that are probably true but could have easily been Photoshopped too.
By the way, if you look hard enough, you might a screencap or 2, or 437, where StickyDrama is saying very naughty things to young boys. Just saying, Mr. Hansen, all those screencaps were Photoshopped too, and all the boys were definitely over the age of 18. Anyway, while it’s impossible to really get inside Yaniv’s mind and know for certain whether the tranny thing is all an act, he presented as male uniformly across social media until recently:
Furthermore, one doesn’t have to have a Ph.D. in International Diplomacy to know that certain cultures, specifically the goat-fucking forehead-tapping-the-carpet-5-times-a-day ones, are just not very friendly to nontraditional sexual orientations and gender identities. Therefore, it is unfair to immediately dismiss as racism Yaniv’s observation: “I hate to put race into it, but it seems there is a lot of negativity and lot of pushback toward LGBTQ from the East Indian culture[.]”
StickyDrama did not ask Yaniv for comment since @trustednerd is still suspended as of the time of our post and we are unaware of any other verified means of contacting this colorful personality. (A Google search for Yaniv indicates several profiles that look shady, including ones associated with Jonathan Yaniv.) StickyDrama is also really just commenting on the National Post’s reporting, which Yaniv did answer regarding all but the recent Twitter suspension.
StickyDrama writes under quarantine in downtown Los Angeles, 2020 having cloaked the world in darkness. It’s a very different place than the carefree days of 2010, when Stickam was still online and boys (legal boys over the age of 18, Mr. Hansen) would joyfully flash their cocks on camera for mod. Now, the apocalypse is nigh and we risk our lives shopping for groceries. So of course it’s the perfect time to revisit this big old mess.
As Chris Hansen has been heavily promoting recently, he interviewed Damien “Dami” Leonhardt, formerly known as Jessica Leonhardt, aka Jessi Slaughter, a full decade after her controversial relationship with former Blood On The Dance Floor signer Dahvie Vanity broke the internet, before that phrase was even a thing. And lo and behold! Now she says that yes, Dahvie did in fact rape her. StickyDrama can barely contain our shock and surprise.
In order not to trigger our more sensitive readers, StickyDrama will not go into graphic detail about the alleged rape. Just kidding! He made her suck his dick. Which, if true, is wrong, illegal, disgusting and definitely absolutely 100% real rape. “Rape rape,” as Republicans and Whoopi Goldberg tend to say. Normally, in the case of an adult and conscious woman, StickyDrama would ask what effort, if any, she made to resist; but in the case of a 10-year-old, we’re going to call it rape even if she gleefully went along at the time.
The problem is that Jessi has zero credibility. She has given many on-the-record interviews over the years, in which she denied that anything sexual took place, for example her Nightline interview. Skip to 2:00 for the good stuff:
StickyDrama even privately interviewed her around 2011 or 2012 and she still maintained Dahvie’s innocence back then too. At the time she had decided that she was a gay trans man—i.e. she still liked dick but considered herself a man, since men can supposedly have tits and pussies too because 2020. Glad to see she’s apparently outgrown that nonsense. Anyway, unless her 2020 Hansen interview were the only piece evidence you’d ever seen, it’s objectively impossible to believe her. And that’s a damn shame, because in our subjective heart of hearts, we do believe her now and only thought she was lying back when she defended Dahvie.
Yes, she was only 10 years old. Yes, rape victims often mix up details. Yes, there’s no such thing as “the perfect victim.” But whether or not anything sexual happened at all is no “detail.” It’s the entire case. Dahvie will never face any criminal charges over the Jessi Slaughter affair, because with all her previous on-the-record denials there’s reasonable doubt all over this case. The statute of limitations has probably run out too. That being said, StickyDrama would not be surprised if all this renewed publicity brings other girls out of the woodwork who don’t have the same credibility issues as Jessi, as we’ve seen in the cases of Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein.
Hansen’s role was not the defense attorney tossing tough questions at a rape victim. He just wanted to elicit Jessi’s story from her. But his failure even to gently ask for an explanation of her on-the-record denials robbed his interview of any sense of truth or fairness. He could have easily phrased his questions to give her a path out of the lie—“I was so young, still loved him, didn’t want him to get in trouble, just wanted the story to die down”—but not even to mention it! Ignoring her on-the-record, nationally broadcast denial of the rape is inexcusable, even by journalistic standards, let alone legal ones.
The pursuit of social justice has been corrupted. At some point, the righteous battle for the civil rights, fueled by legitimate grievances, was hijacked by social justice warriors with fascist agendas. But 2015 was the year that saw the SJW narrative crescendo and collapse on all fronts.
Rape Culture: The Witch Trials Of Third Wave Feminism
It is unfortunate that feminism has become a dirty word, given its noble origins. We should speak of feminism in three “waves” to separate the good from the bad: the First Wave can be considered the suffragettes who fought for the right to vote during the early 1900s; the Second Wave, which is concerned with equal pay and reproductive rights, arose during the 1960s and still exists today; the Third Wave reared its ugly head in the 1990s, and that’s when all the trouble started. When conservatives complain of man-hating feminazis, they usually mean the Third Wave feminists.
Viewing the Third Wave in the most favorable light, one would say that it is concerned with ending patriarchal attitudes in society. Put it in more judgmental terms, the Third Wave is obsessed with a female victim/male oppressor dichotomy where women are always innocent victims and men are always vile assailants. The Third Wave believes that society facilitates rape by excusing or rationalizing men’s behavior–so-called rape culture, a nebulous term that has been criticized as unhelpful by the rape survivor group RAINN.
In order to combat rape culture, the Third Wave thinking goes, alleged rape victims should never be questioned. How to conduct an investigation without questioning the victim? Feminists like Zerlina Maxwell argued that, since proof beyond a reasonable doubt is a difficult standard to meet and too many rapists escape punishment, an accusation of rape should be enough. The presumption of innocence and due process should be discarded, according to these feminists, because the harm a man suffers by a false accusation (which they claim almost never happens) pales in comparison to the harm a woman suffers when her rape claim is doubted.
Unfortunately the federal government lapped up the Third Wave’s narrative–in universities for now, and one shudders to think that this insanity will invade our courts. In its infamous “dear colleague” letter, the federal Office of Civil Rights implemented the lowered standard of proof and the abrogation of due process that militant advocates like Maxwell have clamored for. At university, an accusation can ruin a male student’s academic career, such as in the Emma Sulkowicz “Mattress Rape” case at Columbia.
Thankfully the Third Wave narrative unravelled when Rolling Stone published Sabrina Ruben Erdely’s “A Rape On Campus,” which was exposed as one of the greatest hoaxes in the history of journalism. Immediately after the story’s publication, dozens of fraternity members at the University of Virginia received death threats and suffered property damage when the world believed that they had orchestrated gang-rapes as an initiation ritual.
Most journalists could not see past their own biases–frat boy rapists, of course!–and praised Erdely for her reporting. But the Washington Post bravely challenged the politically correct policy of never questioning a rape victim, and in doing so they exposed the Erdely’s “A Rape On Campus” as a work of SJW fiction. Even feminists took Erdely to task for setting rape activism back 30 years by making skepticism politically acceptable.
The Cotton Ceiling: Trans Doublethink
It ain’t easy being trans. Boys Don’t Cry depicted a brutal account of the rejection and violence faced by trans men and women. But their victimization does not justify the Orwellian thought control being paraded around as tolerance.
It began with insidiously reasonable requests relating to language. Deliberately referring to a trans person by his or her original gender became “misgendering,” which is hateful transphobia. So far, so good: It seems fair that everyone should be able to choose one’s own name and identity. (Except when you invent words that don’t remotely resemble English.)
But courtesy veered into historical revision: Referring to a trans person’s original sex was verboten even when discussing someone’s pre-transition life. For example, we must say that Caitlyn Jenner won an Olympic medal, that she was an athlete, even though all the record books say that Bruce Jenner won an Olympic medal and that he was an athlete. It’s not an entirely unreasonable request, even if it values sensitivity over accuracy.
The next battlefield was over the bathroom, particularly in schools. While it is foolish to think that transsexuals have any prurient interest in using this or that bathroom, it is likewise foolish to expect everyone to be OK with this. (At StickyDrama’s dorm in the University of California at Berkeley, all bathrooms were unisex, which worked out fine after an initial discomfort.) By using the language of victimization, the trans advocates won the ear of the federal government, which has forced school districts to allow trans students use whatever bathroom they please. Here we see how the mantra “trans women are real women, trans men are real men” is used to justify a sort of sexual de-segregation.
But the new trans agenda has caused even the most liberal and progressive non-trans groups to rethink how far they will allow such nonsense: the so-called Cotton Ceiling.
The Cotton Ceiling was coined by trans activist and porn star Drew DeVeaux. It refers to the tendency of lesbians to exhibit supposed transphobia by refusing to have sex with trans women. If a lesbian refuses to have sex with a trans woman—in other words, a person who was born male, including a trans woman who still has a penis—she is transphobic, bigoted, hateful, even if the lesbian is otherwise supportive of trans advocacy.
Trans advocates attempted to shame lesbians who refused to have sex with trans women. To the lesbians who were uncomfortable with a trans woman’s penis, the trans advocates reply that “sex is more than genitals” and that refusing to try sex with a trans person simply because of the genitals is, you guessed it, transphobic. Trans women are real women, they say, and any distinction of biological sex versus gender identification is invalid. Anyone who dares to deny that 2 + 2 = 5 is transphobic.
Enough, screamed the lesbians. We support your civil rights, just please don’t shove your lady sticks in our faces. Outraged trans advocates termed this group of lesbians TERFs: Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists.
What trans advocates are really advocating is the abrogation of the right to freedom of association–in this case, an intimate association. Lesbians prefer to associate with natural-born women, which runs counter to the trans position that “trans women are women”; i.e. no difference exists between a trans woman and a biological female. Therein lies the Orwellian doublethink: trans women’s bodies are different than biologically female bodies, regardless of politically correct exigencies.
Cultural Appropriation and Safe Spaces: Politically Correct Fascism
If trans advocacy attacks the freedom of association, cultural appropriation attacks the freedom of expression.
Cultural appropriation began with the condemnation of blackface and Native American themes in fashion. Then, it was somehow decided that white women should not braid their hair. It has developed into a labyrinth of guidelines and prohibitions on how to look and what to wear, especially on Halloween.
The problem is, parodies–even racially insensitive parodies–are sacrosanct in American jurisprudence. And nothing enrages advocates more than suggesting that they should just deal with it: Instead of a dialogue–“listen to minorities,” the SJW says–obedience is really the goal, and anything less than full immediate compliance is met with a shouting match.
“But we’re exercising our right to free speech by voicing our discontent,” say the SJWs. No: Free speech encourages a debate, but it does not tolerate the silencing of contrary views, whether by physical force or shouting. SJWs do not want a dialogue, which by definition is a back-and-forth; SJWs want to be the only voice in the room. Even if that room is on a university campus.
From that sentiment arose “safe spaces.” In a safe space, only one voice is permitted. Any opposing view is supposedly unsafe; however, unsafe is merely doublespeak for offensive. Again, by exploiting the language of victimization (“this speech makes me feel unsafe” rather than “this speech offends me”) SJWs attempt to deprive the holders of contrary views of their most fundamental civil liberties.
This fascist mentality was actually gaining traction in universities across the nation–until Melissa Click. When the university professor used the threat of physical violence to intimidate a journalist from entering a safe space, even the most liberal news media organizations were appalled.
Social Justice Isn’t Justice–It’s Extortion
Radical feminists, trans advocates, race baiters: The Internet united these relatively small, marginalized groups that had been scattered around the globe into hordes of formidable influence. By coordinating their efforts, these hordes forged victimization into a weapon against the descendants of their traditional oppressors. These beneficiaries of imperialism felt guilty for the sins of their ancestors, and the hordes accordingly exploited the language of victimization to gain political power. This tactic was termed social justice.
Social justice can be distinguished from traditional justice. Traditional justice values above all factual truth and fairness to the individual, and it aims to achieve equal opportunity in society by protecting civil rights. Traditional justice is not so much concerned with crimes that took place hundreds of years ago and their effects on society today.
By contrast, social justice aims to create equal results in society by remedying past wrongs. Factual support is ideal but not necessary; in social justice, the agenda or narrative trumps all, even the truth. And while SJWs would argue that social justice is also concerned with fairness, their brand of fairness values groups over individuals–fairness that is viewed through a generational lens.
In social justice, innocent individuals inherit the collective guilt of their ancestors, and in one form or another must pay accordingly. The SJWs’ demands could conceivably be justified if they were a form of compensation for actual wrongdoings. But when predicated on ideologies that ignore or outright deny any inconvenient fact, their demands amount to nothing more than a confidence game. Thankfully, 2015 was the year in which mainstream society realized that the SJW platform is un-American and no less dangerous to our way of life than an invasion by China.
You know how some people should just…never EVER try. I came across one of those on flickr.
I have no clue if its a he/she…either way whatever it is, IT NEEDS TO BE STOPPED AT ALLLL COSTS.
[Sticky’s note: This was such an obvious self-post, I almost didn’t approve it. But after a minute of watching the video, I realized that this fat tranny has gone beyond fail and entered lolcow territory. I edited the title to something more appropriate and voila, lulz.]
Watch out brandon and jeffree
this is a still from his totally awesome low budget music video that he made in his bathroom
watch his debut music video its fab!
“david overdose” [david wilson] (www.myspace.com/daswispopin)
okay so something’s fishy about this two.
they use to be “bestfriends” a while back. and out of nowhere this two just magically appeared on the internet and was posted on the same day.
i just think they’re both BEGGING for attention.
and didn’t they go out before?.
about davidoverdose: he’s a 16yr old boy who’s supposedly known for busing it to clubs and begs for other people to give him a ride home. this is mostly true. i’ve seen him around the clubs i.e: matinee and dance and mode7. he moves from guy to guy and i’ve seen him make-out with more than one boy at the same night.
about omfgjhamjham: a 19yr old BOY.( looks can fool you.) clubbing and partying is this kid’s addiction. a low key yet high key slut. a very shallow person who’ll only talk to you if you’re “attractive”.
learn how to handle your scandal kids.
[Sticky’s note: While it’s no secret that I probably won’t buy @StevenTroye a Christmas present this year, I’d like to make it clear that I did not write this post. I only approved it.]
noticed a few days ago that Steven has been spending a lot of time with a guy named @nickjamessss and I had a feeling some trouble would brew. Fgts are jealous people and I knew that Anthony wouldn’t disappoint on the drama level.
his tweets last night:
Seems that everyone went to Tiger Heat, and the night started out fun but turned ugly … for no apparent reason. Steven’s tweets:
Whine bitch moan complain doesn’t actually say what the problem is yawn.
Llooks like Nick is pretty dramatic himself:
I can’t wait for the accusations of cheating to start flying…which of course they will. Discuss.